tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5285812003538838741.post8701701511909873878..comments2008-12-10T07:12:43.210ZChristopher Kellyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10660157291722137172noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5285812003538838741.post-22890592069240047402008-12-10T07:12:00.000Z2008-12-10T07:12:00.000ZFunny isn't it. In offline conversation, there would be no question of whether or not research into the segment being targetted was carried out. Why does this suddenly change when the conversation moves online? If anything, there is more reason for an in depth study to be carried out into the culture and etiquette of online communities, as the information is inextricably recorded for all to see. Inappropriate community engagement can, and invariably will, continue to haunt the organisation. <BR/><BR/>Thanks for the comments, Danny. I am interested in seeing those Intel social media guidelines... I will look through those after work this evening.The Lovable Rogue also known as Chrishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10660157291722137172noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5285812003538838741.post-582797693649458062008-12-10T06:43:00.000Z2008-12-10T06:43:00.000ZSpot on analysis as usual, Chris. Which begs the question, when will this kind of advice start to be heeded?<BR/><BR/>Anyone in doubt should take a look at Intel's company social media guidelines - now THAT's a company that's on the ball.<BR/><BR/>http://www.intel.com/sites/sitewide/en_US/social-media.htmDanny Brownhttp://dannybrown.menoreply@blogger.com